The New York Times debates Why didn't the US foresee the Arab revolts?
Why would this fact be a surprise? Mubarak, Ben Ali and Gaddafi failed to foresee the same revolts despite committing far greater resources to the task.
How do we even know if the premise of the question is correct? I am not on the President's reading list for Top Secret intelligence and neither is the New York Times. If the intelligence services had been predicting the collapse of these miserable dictatorships I would hope that they would keep it to themselves.
All six of the 'experts' asked to comment on the question assume that its premise must be correct and that had the US predicted the revolts they should have somehow acted to prevent them.
That was certainly the old model of US foreign policy: Propping up dictators in the name of 'stability'.
As the past four weeks proved, it didn't work.
3 comments:
It's hard to find quality writing like yours these days. I really appreciate people like you! Take care and see you soon
Carbonless Forms
Well according to me giving a worng reply to a question really helps in understanding and clearing your concept as to what was being conveyed.
Discount Steel Buildings
We offer essential exam training material and knowledge. Select the training on internet or our products will be delivered to you. 1Z0-580, 1Z0-117, HP2-N44 We are confident about our exam damps and we will refund the full amount back to you if you fail your exam.
Post a Comment